Selection and Succession
Strengthen your critical hire decisions with robust psychological insights
Senior appointments carry disproportionate risk
When an organisation appoints the wrong person into a critical leadership role, the cost is not limited to recruitment fees.
It has an impact through lower performance, damaged relationships, loss of critical talent and destablised teams. In some cases it can take years to recover the strategic momentum that is lost.
Even internal succession decisions are often made with incomplete behavioural insight.
Capability may be assumed from past performance. However, new roles bring new challenges and it’s important to understand how the individual’s leadership style, pressure patterns, motivational drivers or cultural impact will play out in a new context.
Insight into these critical psychological success factors can help prevent expensive leadership hiring mistakes.
The Cost of a Senior Mis-hire: A rule of thumb
Executive search fees: typically 25–35% of first-year salary.
Time to full productivity in a senior role: often 6–12 months.
Cost of replacing a senior leader: frequently estimated at 1.5–2× salary once recruitment, lost productivity, disruption and team impact are included.
… and that doesn’t include the opportunity cost of missing out on a great leader, or the reduced productivity whilst they are in role.
Our Assessment Solutions
We provide structured executive assessment and succession planning support grounded in occupational psychology.
Each engagement begins by clarifying what success in the role actually requires.
This includes defining behavioural expectations, leadership demands, cultural contribution, and the commercial context in which the individual will operate.
We then use validated leadership psychometric assessment tools alongside structured behavioural interviews to explore strengths, development risks, pressure patterns, values and motivational drivers.
The output is clear, comparative insights that support confident decision-making.
Where appropriate, this is followed by targeted development planning to accelerate readiness and reduce transition risk, or onboarding coaching to support transition into role and ensure early impact.
“Past performance tells you what someone has done. Executive assessment helps you understand HOW they will lead.”
Strengthening Decision Confidence
Whether appointing externally or reviewing internal succession, the quality of the decision shapes performance for years to come.
Adding psychological rigour allows appointments to be made with greater clarity and confidence.
Decision-makers have insight into candidates’ strengths, risks, cultural impact and derailers, rather than relying solely on past performance or interview impression.
This supports fairer, less biased selection and succession decisions.
Over time, this strengthens leadership bench depth and increases the organisation’s confidence in its succession pipeline, as well as driving sustained high performance.
“Thank you so much for the amazing job you have done with these assessments.
I have sat in on the debriefs for the candidates and it seems like you have captured the individuals very well and fed it back in an easily ‘digestible’ way.
Appreciate very much your responsiveness and flexibility given the tight timings!”
If you’re making a critical leadership appointment or reviewing succession readiness, we can provide structured behavioural insight to support confident decision-making.
FAQs
-
Senior leadership hires rarely fail because of technical capability alone. More often, the gap sits in behavioural fit, decision style, cultural impact, or how an individual responds under pressure. Expectations may be implicit rather than defined, and interview processes tend to over-weight confidence and past success. Without structured behavioural assessment, risk remains largely unseen until the individual is in role.
-
Leadership potential is assessed through a combination of role-based success profiling, validated psychometric assessment, and structured behavioural interviewing. The focus is on cognitive capability, motivational drivers, learning orientation, interpersonal impact and likely performance under pressure. The aim is to understand not just what someone has done, but how they are likely to lead in the context of this specific role and the extend of their capacity for growth.
-
Bias often enters senior appointments through informal sponsorship, similarity effects, over-reliance on intuition, or untested assumptions about “fit.” A structured assessment process introduces consistent criteria, comparative behavioural data, and evidence-based evaluation. This supports fairer, more transparent and defensible decision-making while maintaining commercial rigour.
-
An executive assessment typically includes clarification of the role’s behavioural requirements, psychometric profiling, structured interviews, and a written report outlining strengths, development risks, cultural impact and succession readiness. Where appropriate, findings are discussed in a facilitated decision conversation to support confident and aligned outcomes.
-
Yes. Structured assessment is particularly valuable for internal succession planning, where assumptions based on performance history can obscure leadership risk or developmental need. It enables clearer comparison between candidates, identification of readiness gaps, and targeted development planning to accelerate progression.
-
When well-validated tools are used appropriately, psychometric assessments provide meaningful insight into traits linked to leadership effectiveness, including cognitive capability, conscientiousness, learning agility and interpersonal style. They do not replace judgement, but they strengthen it by making behavioural patterns and potential risks visible before decisions are finalised.